The European Shippers’ Council (ESC), European and international freight forwarders’ associations (FIATA and CLECAT), and the European representation of maritime terminals and stevedores (FEPORT) have voiced opposition to the proposal requiring the gross weight of cargo to be verified pre-boarding.

The matter is up for discussion at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) this week.

“The safety of those involved in the supply chain is of paramount importance to these associations; a focus on best practice which results in improved safety in the chain should reflect equally positively on the level of performance and productivity in the chain,” a joint statement from the groups said.

“However, the proposed container weight verification requirement is in the view of the associations ineffective,” it added.

From September 16 to 21, the IMO will discuss a draft amendment that will make mandatory the verification of the weight of every loaded container through a certified process.

In their statement, the associations said that additional legislation would not improve container safety in transport overseas. Instead, they are pushing for an improvement of the data communication process, that is, “a proper risk analysis of the quality of the data transferred between shipping lines, shippers and customs authorities.”

They also pointed to the unanswered questions on “how post-treatment of infringements should be dealt with and who is responsible for the onward effects on the operations of the port.”

Rather than pursuing the “unattainable goal” of weighing every single packed container throughout the globe, the IMO should work on effective solutions to the safety issues at hand, the associations said in another release.

They made specific recommendations to the organization to start addressing the following issues immediately instead.

• To formulate a clear legally binding deadline for shippers and freight forwarders to present shipping instructions to the carrier. This deadline should give carriers sufficient time to produce a stowage plan on the basis of real-time data, but should also be flexible enough for shippers to make the necessary last-minute changes, the groups said.

• To improve the quality of lashing of containers on board of a ship, which will significantly reduce the loss of containers at sea.

• To improve the quality of stuffing containers and reduce the chances for altering caterpillar trucks, tumbling containers from terminal cranes, and trucks rolling over.

 

Photo: roger4336

You May Also Like

ASEAN must strengthen IT industry or miss digital economic boom

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member countries could miss out on major opportunities in the emerging digital economy if they don’t harmonize…

Box shipping fundamentals improved in 2016; carriers to consolidate further in 2017—reports

Even as 2016 witnessed the container shipping industry hitting bottom, it may also be seen as the year the sector finally began to seriously…

Maersk Line yields $507M profit despite lower freight rates

The Maersk group said it delivered a “satisfactory profit” in the second quarter of 2015 of US$1.1 billion against $2.3 billion in the same…

Container terminals in era of higher risks, lower returns, experts say

The container terminal industry may well have to learn to live with higher risks and lower returns as global trade flows have changed in…