Clarity of prices and surcharges is what shippers and freight forwarders appear most concerned about, especially in view of IMO 2020, according to the third annual shipper satisfaction survey of Drewry and the European Shippers’ Council (ESC).

Customer satisfaction was reported least favorable for clarity of prices and surcharges; transit times; and reliability of booking/cargo shipped as booked. Satisfaction for these categories scored between 2.8 and 3 on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), the joint ESC and Drewry survey revealed.

Overall service of container shipping lines was rated by the 249 exporters, importers and forwarders who took part in the survey as 3.1 on average, which is 0.1 lower than last year, the joint ESC and Drewry survey revealed.

The carrier service attributes that shippers were the most satisfied with were carrier financial stability, documentation accuracy, and availability of equipment (containers), which received average scores between 3.2 and 3.4.

All the service features were overall awarded mid-range scores; only 4% of customers were “very dissatisfied” with carrier services and only 6% were “very satisfied,” said the joint release.

Shippers and forwarders also said carrier performance has deteriorated between 2017 and 2018 in four areas: the range of different available carriers, the range of different available services, the price of service, and the overall carrier service quality.

But carrier performance related to sustainability/green and to carrier financial stability has improved since 2017, according to the survey respondents.

“The survey results reinforce the opinion already expressed in the recent ESC Position Paper and in the message addressed to the EU Directorate-General for Competition on the Consortia BER [block exemption regulation] that more transparency is needed from maritime carriers,” said Jordi Espin, ESC maritime transport policy manager.

“Service levels, performance targets, market improvements, and price structuring should be set with a focus on clarity and an open observation analysis,” Espin added.

“It is very clear that clarity of prices and surcharges has become a key topic for shippers and forwarders—particularly medium-sized ones,” said Philip Damas, head of the logistics practice at Drewry.

“Starting from the 2018 emergency fuel surcharges and continuing with the current uncertainty over post-IMO 2020 fuel surcharges we expect the conversation between carriers and shippers to remain ongoing in 2019.”

“In the short term, carriers ought to be more transparent in their new BAF matrices and formulae and need to address their customers’ growing needs for predictability and visibility of carrier performance in the long run if they want to reach good levels of customer satisfaction,” added Damas.

Photo: Martin Damboldt from Pexels

You May Also Like

Marina, DOE to craft plan for IMO 2020 compliance

The Maritime Industry Authority (MARINA) and the Department of Energy (DOE) are set to formulate a comprehensive plan for implementing the International Maritime Organization…

Cathay Pacific, HK airport authority introduce cargo terminal charge cuts

The Cathay Pacific group is introducing a new terminal charge concession at Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) effective April. Customers of export shipments from…

Vietnam’s Cai Mep-Thi Vai port records traffic uptick

Terminal operators at the struggling Cai Mep-Thi Vai port system in southeastern Vietnam are grabbing onto slivers of hope following a slight rise in…

Transportation and logistics heads name top concerns for 2012

Rising energy costs, the gloomy global economy, and recruiting the right talent are among the key concerns in 2012 for CEOs in the transportation…