CARGO-handler Amerasia International Services, Inc is seeking a stop to the awarding of the Naval Supply Depot (NSD) contract to Harbour Centre Port Terminal, Inc (HCPTI) by the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA).

Amerasia recently filed criminal charges at the Office of Ombudsman against officials of SBMA and HCPTI, accusing them of “perpetrating, in conspiracy with each other the crime defined in the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act … as well as the crime defined in Article 186 of the Revised Penal Code” on monopolies and restraint of trade.

SBMA will soon award the NSD contract to HCPTI after no other company expressed interest in the depot. HCPTI earlier submitted an unsolicited bid for the NSD.

The only thing preventing the award at this point is the election ban, from which SBMA has already sought exemption.

Amerasia said it was compelled to file charges after the SBMA on February 24, 2010 entered into an alleged anomalous joint venture agreement with HCPTI. Under the deal, the complainant said HCPTI was effectively granted by SBMA a monopoly of all operations (including the development, management and operation) in all existing usable wharves and ports located at the Subic Bay Freeport Zone.

The complaint contains alleged factual evidence which established SBMA’s “partiality”, “bad faith, and gross negligence in approving the contract”.

The contract disregarded “the fact that said wharves/ports are precisely where existing cargo handling operators are presently operating and doing business pursuant to their valid and existing contractual rights,” the complaint pointed out.

Nullification of contract

“The SBMA-HCPTI contract effectively nullified, without due process, Amerasia’s valid and outstanding 25-year Lease and Cargo Handling Operations Contract with SBMA,” Amerasia legal counsel Atty. Eulalio Ventura said in a statement.

“We hope that the charges we have filed before the Ombudsman will stop the awarding of the contract and ensure the protection of the locators’ right to operate the Subic ports and wharves. After all, they have invested millions of pesos and exerted a lot of efforts to make them clean, efficient, and profitable for SBMA,” Ventura said.

Included in the respondents are members of the SBMA Joint Venture Selection (JVSP) Committee headed by SBMA Administrator and CEO and JVSP Chairman Armand Arreza, who recommended the approval of the HCPTI proposal and contract. A second group of respondents comprise the SBMA Board of Directors headed by its chairman, Feliciano Salonga, who first approved in principle the HCPTI proposal and HCPTI chairman Reghis Romero II and HCPTI chief executive Michael Romero.

An Amerasia statement said the company handles about 70% of the break bulk and general cargo in Subic and contributed P400 million in SBMA revenues in its 14 years of operation. It provides livelihood for 300 families.

Similarly situated cargo-handling firms as well as port users may follow Amerasia’s lead and file similar charges against SBMA and HCPTI.5/10/2010

You May Also Like

BOC accreditation body returns to intel group

The Philippine Bureau of Customs’ accreditation unit, Account Management Office (AMO), is now back with the Intelligence Group (IG), a move the agency said…

PPA records 6% higher income in 2017

The Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) reported a P4.966-billion net income in 2017, 6% higher than the P4.699 billion it earned in 2016 driven by…

2 jetties under construction to support Boracay’s rehab

The Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) is developing two jetties in Boracay to support maintenance of the rehabilitated island that was recently opened to tourist…

ICTSI Georgia unit, Arkas Line ink terminal services agreement

Batumi International Container Terminal LLC (BICTL) recently signed a terminal services agreement with Arkas Line, a new shipping line to call at BICT. According…